Source code review
services Malaysia.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST), manual code auditing, and secure code review. Our consultants identify vulnerabilities at the code level, validating against OWASP, SANS, and delivering Bank Negara RMiT, PDPA, and ISO 27001-ready evidence.
CONSULTANT CERTIFICATIONS
What to review, how long it takes, what you get
If you are comparing providers, the difference is not the SAST scanner used. It is whether the team can prove exploitability and produce code-level evidence your auditor, board, and engineers can all use.
Start with SOC 2. Every other framework gets easier.
One secure coding control maps to many frameworks. Review and evidence it once, and the same work counts toward the next standard your buyers or regulator ask for.
Indicative overlap based on shared control coverage · confirmed against your codebase during scoping
Comprehensive source code review
From web applications to embedded firmware — manual-led secure code review across the whole codebase, not just the parts a SAST scanner flags.
Web applications
React, Angular, Node.js, Java, .NET codebases reviewed for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
Mobile applications
iOS (Swift) and Android (Kotlin) source code reviews for secure storage and IPC.
APIs & Microservices
Deep dive into REST, GraphQL, and gRPC services for authorization and injection flaws.
Cloud functions
Serverless architectures, AWS Lambda, Azure Functions security review.
Smart Contracts
Web3, Solidity, and Rust contract reviews to prevent financial exploits.
Legacy systems
C/C++, PHP, and older frameworks reviewed for memory corruption and logic issues.
CI/CD pipelines
Review of infrastructure as code (IaC), GitHub Actions, and deployment scripts.
Authentication flows
Focused review on OAuth, SAML, JWT, and SSO implementations.
Cryptography
Review of encryption algorithms, key generation, and random number usage.
OWASP and SANS Secure Coding — every engagement, same discipline
Aligning to recognised standards means code-level findings translate into the control frameworks your auditors already use, providing irrefutable evidence of secure development practices.
Scoping and planning
Define languages, repositories, and objectives. Gather access and set up the review environment.
Static Analysis (SAST)
Automated scanning of the codebase using commercial and open-source tools to identify low-hanging fruit.
Manual Code Review
Deep-dive manual inspection of critical components like authentication, cryptography, and business logic.
Validation & Triage
Reviewing automated findings to remove false positives and validate real risk.
Exploit Scenario Mapping
Determining how a code-level vulnerability could be exploited in a running application.
Reporting
Deliver findings with risk ratings, line-number references, and secure coding remediation guidance.
What lands at the end of the engagement
A structured pack, not a SAST scanner export. We walk your technical team through the findings on a debrief call so the code fixes are understood, not just documented.
Why teams pick nCrypt
Engagements follow strict scoping and reporting discipline; consultants hold OSCP, OSCE, and CSSLP.
Financial-sector findings map into RMiT remediation and board-reporting workflows.
Clear risk ratings, line numbers, and secure code fixes, not just a SAST scanner export.
Free verification testing after remediation, so fixes are proven rather than assumed.
ACCREDITATIONS & TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
Source code review services by scope
Questions buyers ask
Not sure what you need?
Tell us what needs testing and we come back with a fixed fee within 48 hours — no hourly estimates.